Daily Betting — Can you Bet Every Day?

We cover the theory and practice of sports betting from different angles. We parse in the publications of various strategies that answer the questions: when, on what and how much money to put. Another actual aspect of betting is: how often to bet, how many bets can or should you do per day? Indeed, some amateurs make almost hundreds of bets per day, while others are limited to just a few, or even one entry.

What is the right approach? According to the results of such players, it is certainly difficult to single out the only correct scheme. At least, nobody collected such statistics, and did not make comparisons. So, we will model different scenarios in this review and analyze the factors. In connection with which we will give recommendations, how much to quantify, where the minimum and maximum limits of the reasonable pass.

How many bets do per day?

On the issue of frequency, the number of prisoners with a betting bet on sports events, there may be two extremes: hundreds of bets per day, or none, not at all. Between these extreme points are intermediate options: dozens of iterations per day, few moves (up to ten). These options will be considered, giving arguments for and against, making comparisons and drawing conclusions in order to reveal the optimal number of bets per day.

To begin, we emphasize a few facts from practice. Sporting events are not uniform. If we consider any kind of sport, that is, a season, there is not a season. It means that at least 2-3 months a year there are no competitions for a particular discipline. Well, in the season the games are uneven.

There are tournaments where matches are played every day. But then, at the end of such a forum, inevitably comes a break. If we are talking about the regular season, the games are also not evenly distributed throughout the week. On the contrary, the main tour takes place either on weekends or it can fit in 1-2 of the week. Since the day does not look like a day, in terms of saturation with sporting events, there is no need to talk about some uniformity of rates.

There is seasonality and cyclicality. So, in the understanding of adequate players, it is the question of exactly the optimal number of bets per game day, when tournaments are played that are followed by the better.

Amateurs and addicted players

Here we must immediately distinguish the behavior of fans, who are literally addicted to the stakes. There comes a new day, and the player is looking for what to bet on. It does not matter, for example, that there are no games in your favorite football leagues today. Such an addicted person feels discomfort if not delivered. This is probably something like the kin “breaking” of the addict.

Not finding the usual competitions, the person with addiction climbs into all sorts of unfamiliar leagues or completely different sports. Bets on youth football, national championships from the football periphery follow. Not finding solace there, followed by betting on hockey, basketball, tennis, eSports, chess, virtual sport.

In general, the player is sent to all serious. Given that in these disciplines, he is absolutely incompetent. The result of such actions is predictable — a deep minus. There are a lot of bets, and the exhaust is negative.

If you recognize yourself, notice the symptoms in the paragraph above, then you need to do something about it. Such dependence on rates is a question of psychology or even psychiatry, if everything is running. We approach the issue a priori from the position that an adequate better should be put only on those sports and championships about which he is informed sufficiently. Yes, it is possible that a player covers 2-3 sports so that they cover the entire calendar year more or less evenly.

This is normal provided that a person understands exactly, watches matches, tracks news. That is, there is a material basis for analysis and forecasting. When the bets are made “from the lantern”, if only for something to “charge” — this is a disease. It is necessary to set tough restrictions. Literally write yourself a poster with the names of the leagues on which you bet.

When the hand is pulled to put on something outside this list, pull yourself back, refrain from adventures. Except you, no one can exercise such control. So if you want to have a chance to earn money, and not just pour money, work on this moment.

Many betting amateurs solve the problem of satisfying their dependence by peeping on forecasts on various free services, portals. There you can find hundreds of forecasts per day for a variety of disciplines. The player thinks that they disclaim responsibility for the predictions, although it is always at those who risk their money. Moreover, these forecasts are written by all sorts of dummies, who are no better, as analysts, than themselves. It turns out that the player makes many tens or hundreds of bets per day.

We do not consider the above cases. We only described them here to protect you from such mistakes. It will be about the optimal number of bets per day, when you consciously select events and outcomes in them. This is the only way to talk about your terrain at a distance of several weeks, a month, a season.

This is the only way to track the dynamics, state progress or regress as forecasts. If the bets are made at random or by someone else’s hints, there can be no talk of any progress, you just pull the most important growth point out of your game.

It is no coincidence that we mentioned the concept: “the quality of forecasts”. This is one of the key factors limiting the number of bets that a player can make even on the most intense competitive day. Suppose that we are talking about European club football, where games mostly fit in two days off. Imagine that a player has a lot of free time and can collect information all week.

Even under such greenhouse conditions, available only to units, it is impossible to review the entire match, even in the review mode, it is impossible to track all the news. Many betters are limited to a brief review of statistics, on services, on the type of “My score” and only from this they draw conclusions for future games, predictions. Even current formulations do not bother, not to mention other important factors.

On the bare statistics to achieve a positive result can’t be. The reason is that the statistics are very thoroughly reflected by the bookmakers in the odds. Finding an advantage and creating prerequisites for distance profits is real only when operating with larger factors related to short distance. It is some significant short trends that conflict with long trends — this is a support for profit. To identify such moments can only be deep in the subject, watching a lot of the match, reviews, carefully tracking the teams, the physical form of athletes and so on.

Practice shows that an experienced player can control the situation in no more than 3-5 leagues. If you try to bet on 10 or more championships, there is already a dispersion of attention, regular omission of many important facts. So, no matter how much you want to quickly wrap the bank, the player rests on the ceiling, after which the quality suffers. So the number of bets, in itself loses its meaning.

For example, making ROI + 5% for a complete bank turnover, the better will earn more in absolute terms if it does not 1-2 circles, but 10 circles. But if the quality has suffered, then there will be no positive ROI, but there will be a minus, a loss of money .Then what’s the point in the race for the number of bets? He is not.

The main psychological and analytical factors affecting the number of bets we considered. Let us turn to the technical side of the issue.

Hundreds of bets per day

Consider the situation that the player analyzed the whole week games in dozens of championships. As a result, approximately 100 bets were chosen on Saturday and Sunday. For the time being, we’ll take out the same quality of forecasts, which we discussed earlier.

What is technically possible to do with these two hundred bets? The choice is not big. It is necessary to divide the bank into very small parts and play the entire selected number of outcomes. The size of the rates will be 1-3%, taking into account the time lag between games.

If a player has a big bank, and he planned to play with a small percentage, then this is half the trouble. Technically, nothing prevents you from playing all this large array of bets at the same time. However, there immediately emerges one trouble. This amount of betting involves all or almost the entire gambling bank; there is no free working capital until the bet is settled. Some newbies may find this the norm, but this is not true.

Experienced better full use of such tools as live bets and already made insurance rates. Some new observations, information always appear already in the course of the games, so making adjustments to forecasts, overlapping, delivering on confident outcomes, taking profits in case of a successful course of an event is all normal practice. As you might guess, all these actions need money, free funds. If the whole bank is played, then there is no such free finance.

Experienced players recommend flirting at the same time no more than 20-30% of the bank. Firstly, there will always be 70-80% of available funds to be able to maneuver in live. Secondly, it protects against cyclical results. Exactly to pass a distance is unreal. In some segments, profit will inevitably be higher than planned, while others will inevitably mark time or drawdown.

If the entire bank is scrolled at a time, then there is a high risk to squander money heavily, hitting such a “pit”. When the predictions are adequate, 3-5 draws of the game cannot continue the drawdown. Making a turn of the deposit not at once, but in several stages, where the chances of completing a circle in a plus are much higher.

So hundreds of bets at the same time or even on the same day, this is technically realistic only with a big bank and a uniform financial strategy that involves iterations independent of each other. However, anyway, the player rests on the lack of operational funds for live and insurance. Well, from big things you can always do small things. In our case, it is worthwhile simply to screen out, of the pre-selected 100 rates, to leave 20-30 of the most confident, with the most reasonable and consistent predictions. The rest is just discarded.

Not always a big game bank is wrapped around a uniform strategy. Many players practice different types of Martingale. The peculiarity of these strategies is that the next bet can be made only after the previous one is calculated. If it lost, then increase the amount for the next step, if won — roll back to the original, minimum amount. This feature leads to the fact that at the same time in the game there can be only one bet.

Attempts to move in parallel several branches of the Martingale and very quickly lead to the reset of the bank. So physically it turns out to make no more than 5-7 rates per day. If you use live, the limit will be about 20-25 attempts. In general, hundreds of betting here does not fit.

Absolutely the same picture haunts those who play with the “ladder” species. Each next bet is made only after winning the previous one. If the bet is lost, then begin a new attempt to “climb the ladder.” Even if several ladders are led in parallel, then we can talk about 15-20 rates per day, not more. It is a bad idea to replace the “ladder” with expresses, immediately gaining all the steps into one complex bet.

The trick is that going from step to step, the player can still do all the same safety live-bets. At some point, this allows us to save the attempt and try again, if it is necessary to pass by the passage of some degree “clouds thickened” due to new circumstances.

On the other hand, many players simply do not have a big bank as such. This means that for a modest starting amount there is no point in using the same uniform strategy with a breakdown of the deposit into small parts of 1-3%. With a small bank, it makes sense either to play evenly, but with a large percentage (at least 10%), or to try to walk the “ladders”, also by setting off 5-10 attempts (5-10 parts of the bank). So at the same time you have to do no more than the same 5-10 rates.

So for the game day they will not be physically more than 20-30. All this logically leads to the same conclusions: even if you have looked at hundreds of potential bets on the weekend, you have to make high-quality screenings and flirt no more than a quarter of this entire amount. The banal desire to save time leads the player to the idea of ​​narrowing the reach, considering only a few leagues.

No bet

Do not forget about such an important option, the possibility of how not to make any bets per day at all. This is a very cool trick, which many newcomers do not realize, do not realize. Choosing bets, dropping out, deciding whether to bet or not is all a product of the player’s conscious decisions, his choice. You need to formulate your scale of confidence. Each condition, the outcome, on which the player considers the possibility of betting, must be assigned a certain level of confidence.

This can be implemented, for example, in the form of “asterisks” or other markers. One star is minimal confidence. Two stars —the average. Three — maximum. In an amicable way, you need to put three-star events on the most confident events, and weed out everything else.

You can use a variable strategy, or use the outcomes with different confidence for different banks and strategies. For example, on the “three-star” outcomes put on 5%, on the “two-star” — 2-3%, on the “one-star” — 0.5-1%.

You can use for the main bank only the most confident outcomes, and from the rest, not included in the final sample, collect large expresses, putting down the minimum amount. This approach kills several “birds with one stone”. So the excitement and the very manifestations of addiction are channeled, if they took place.

There is no feeling that in vain considered hundreds of matches. Financial losses from losing such expressions are insignificant, even if it has been practiced for decades. But sooner or later, someone will go in and discourage all costs for many years of this pampering ahead. To treat such disposal of unnecessary outcomes should be like a game in a lottery. So at least there is a chance to win.

With such a bundle of serious money, the main bank is put on the best outcomes. On the other hand, everything else is formally not wasted in vain and does not hit the main bank. This is a reasonable compromise. At the same time, if you have everything in order with manifestations of excitement and psychology, then you can discard all eliminated outcomes without regret and waste time on assembling the mentioned expresses.

The optimal number of bets

Here we come to the formulation of conclusions. The number of bets that are reasonably done per day is not determined by the fulfillment of any rigid plans, but only by the internal gradation of confidence. If there is not a single enough good bet per day, then this is no reason to lower the threshold, and the reason is simply not to put anything. In addition to confidence, other objective limiters on the number of bets are: the size of the game bank and the rules of financial strategy.

Even if there are relatively many good options per day, you can always leave as many of the best ones as you can with your financial strategy, through quality selection. Usually, a normal number is considered to be from a few (3-5), up to a couple of dozen rates per day (10-20). A larger amount either leads to a decrease in quality, or simply cannot be played objectively. It is impossible to reshape the strategy, to abandon insurance for the sake of mastering a large number of potential outcomes.